Williamson’s Caring Argument Against Analyzing Knowledge
(This is a shortened version of an original blog post by acullison. For the original, please visit Feed: Wide Scope)
Williamson thinks that the fact that we have yet to come up with a suitable analysis of knowledge post-Gettier, among other things, should push us to accept that there is no analysis of knowledge.
He thinks that we should treat knowledge as an unanalyzable primitive.
Here’s something I find puzzling, he argues that we should regard knowledge as an unanalyzable primitive even if it turned out that knowledge was co-extensive with some complex analysis. Here’s
Read original >>